SMU H3 Notes Game TheoryGamesSMU H3

Infinite-Horizon Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma

Game theory analysis: Infinite-Horizon Repeated Prisoner's Dilemma.


Setup

Definition:

Infinite-Horizon Repeated Prisoner’s Dilemma

  • Players: Two players, Player 1 and Player 2.
  • Strategies: Each player chooses CC or DD in every period; Grim Trigger: start with CC; after any defection by any player, choose DD forever.

Rules

Payoff Matrix

CD
C4, 4-2, 6
D6, -20, 0

Derivation (Best Response Analysis)

VC=4+δVC=41δ.V_C = 4 + \delta V_C = \frac{4}{1-\delta}. VD=6+δ0=6,V_D = 6 + \delta \cdot 0 = 6,

because all future play switches to (D,D)(D,D).

41δ6\frac{4}{1-\delta} \geq 6 δ13.\delta \geq \frac{1}{3}.

Derivation (Nash Equilibrium)

Nash Equilibrium

Result:

If δ13\delta \geq \tfrac{1}{3}, the strategy profile in which both players use Grim Trigger is a subgame perfect Nash equilibrium and sustains (C,C)(C,C) forever on the equilibrium path.

Social Optimum

Insights

Insight:

  • A severe and credible punishment can overturn the one-shot dominance of defection.
  • The condition δ13\delta \geq \tfrac{1}{3} measures how much players value the future relative to the current gain from cheating.
← Back to Blog