SMU H3 Notes Game TheoryConceptsSMU H3

Game Theory Chapter 6: Combining Sequential and Simultaneous Moves

SMU H3 Game Theory Chapter 6 theory and concept notes.


Chapter 6: Combining Sequential and Simultaneous Moves

Games with both Sequential and Simultaneous Moves

Definition:

A sequential game can contain proper subgames, and some of those subgames may themselves be simultaneous-move games written in normal form.

Subgames

Definition:

A subgame is a part of an extensive-form game that begins at a single decision node and contains that node together with all its successors. The full game is a subgame of itself.

Insight:

Subgames isolate continuation problems: once a node is reached, players face a smaller game that must still be solved rationally.

Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibrium

Definition:

A subgame perfect Nash equilibrium is a pair of strategies, one for each player, that forms a Nash equilibrium in every subgame.

Result:

SPNE rules out equilibria supported by non-credible continuation behaviour.

Backward Induction over Subgames

Definition:

When a later stage is itself a game, backward induction replaces that subgame by its Nash-equilibrium outcome and then moves backward to earlier decisions.

Insight:

Rollback with subgames is the same logic as ordinary backward induction, except the continuation object is a game rather than a single move.

Writing Strategies in Sequential Games

Definition:

In an extensive-form game, a strategy is a complete contingent plan specifying an action at every node a player could face.

Normal Form versus Extensive Form

Definition:

The normal-form representation of an extensive game lists all complete contingent strategies and the payoff associated with every strategy profile.

Insight:

Normal form is complete about strategies; extensive form is sharper about credibility.

Changing Order of Play

Definition:

Changing the order of play changes who can commit first and who gets to respond after observing earlier actions.

Result:

Timing is strategically relevant because equilibrium depends not only on payoffs, but also on who moves when and what they observe.

← Back to Blog